<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 2008 Telnet (not SSH) Server</title>
	<link>http://www.gyrate.org/2008/03/17/windows-2008-telnet-not-ssh-server/</link>
	<description>Where high-tech meets low-life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thom Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.gyrate.org/2008/03/17/windows-2008-telnet-not-ssh-server/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gyrate.org/2008/03/17/windows-2008-telnet-not-ssh-server/#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>Why should it matter what windows does?  If you're setting up a server, use unix.  If your company insists on using windows and can't be convinced otherwise by their own experts, find a company that isn't trying to kill itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should it matter what windows does?  If you&#8217;re setting up a server, use unix.  If your company insists on using windows and can&#8217;t be convinced otherwise by their own experts, find a company that isn&#8217;t trying to kill itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.gyrate.org/2008/03/17/windows-2008-telnet-not-ssh-server/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gyrate.org/2008/03/17/windows-2008-telnet-not-ssh-server/#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>Cisco does the same thing with telnet... SSH is new for them. do you expect MS to jump in and use SSH? at best they will add their own (incompatible) changes to SSH and call it something else.

"Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." – Henry Spencer

It's a shame we will all have to support this garbage... I think MS should just roll out Xenix again and be done with it. Unix is for servers, Windows is for...playing solitair. they could even do what Novell did with Netware -- have a Linux base (Xenix in MS's case) and have the Netware (Windows Server) services run on top of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco does the same thing with telnet&#8230; SSH is new for them. do you expect MS to jump in and use SSH? at best they will add their own (incompatible) changes to SSH and call it something else.</p>
<p>&#8220;Those who don&#8217;t understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.&#8221; – Henry Spencer</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame we will all have to support this garbage&#8230; I think MS should just roll out Xenix again and be done with it. Unix is for servers, Windows is for&#8230;playing solitair. they could even do what Novell did with Netware &#8212; have a Linux base (Xenix in MS&#8217;s case) and have the Netware (Windows Server) services run on top of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
